Follow-Up Recommendations

🏠 Overview ›👤 Leonardo Olvera

RUNS ANALYSED

1,420 Units

ACTUAL REJECTION

7.3%

their own output

EXPECTED REJECTION

6.3%

for their model mix

GAP VS EXPECTED

+1.0

percentage points

🧭

Assessment

Compared like-for-like against the models they were assigned

⚪ Within the expected range. Leonardo Olvera performs in line with the rejection expected for the models they were assigned. No follow-up needed on quality grounds.

⚖ Rejection here is measured against the models this person was actually assigned, not a plant-wide average. Someone given harder models should not appear worse for running them. Figures cover a single import period and reflect output only — they do not capture experience, shift conditions, or workload.

🧩

Models Run

Their result on each model against everyone else's result on the same model

Model	Machine Runs	TOTAL PRODUCTION	Their Rejection	Model Baseline	Difference	OEE
Style 640-17 5H	9	526	5.3%	5.0%	+0.3	78%
R69 -18 ET-40-57	2	209	4.3%	8.0%	-3.7	88%
Style 640-16 5H	2	203	9.4%	6.3%	+3.0	77%
SMX201X-22	4	180	15.0%	9.5%	+5.5	49%
444-18 4H	1	79	5.1%	4.3%	+0.7	75%
666-18 5H	1	72	8.3%	6.6%	+1.8	74%
666-17 5H	1	55	7.3%	5.5%	+1.8	48%
444-17 5H	1	32	15.6%	6.1%	+9.5	62%
R62 ET- 45-52	1	23	4.3%	7.0%	-2.6	100%
CV98-20	1	21	0.0%	6.5%	-6.5	40%
CV44-22	1	20	0.0%	0.0%	+0.0	0%

🏭

Machines Operated

Where they worked, and how each machine performed

M/C No.	Machine Runs	TOTAL PRODUCTION	Rejection %	Total Downtime	OEE
4	6	503	7.4%	510 min	67%
7	5	339	4.7%	210 min	81%
16	4	276	8.0%	80 min	81%
5	3	108	8.3%	260 min	50%
6	2	22	4.5%	680 min	100%
14	2	80	15.0%	180 min	47%
17	1	20	0.0%	0 min	0%
15	1	72	8.3%	60 min	74%

⏱

Downtime by Reason

Downtime recorded during their runs

Reason	Minutes	Share of Downtime
Rework systemic	940 min	47.5
Mech	680 min	34.3
Trouble Shooting	90 min	4.5
Elec	90 min	4.5
Metal Pouring & Dross Cleaning	90 min	4.5
Metal Delay	60 min	3.0
Over Cycle Time	30 min	1.5

🧭 Follow-Up Recommendations