๐ŸŽฏ Team Analytics Report

Strengths, weaknesses, and pattern frequencies per team โ€” Last 30 Days (2026-10-03 โ†’ 2026-11-01)

๐Ÿ“Š Weekly Report New Report
Analysis Period: Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 90 Days All Time
SHIFTS ANALYZED
5
Shift
AVG PRODUCTION / SHIFT
136
Units
AVG REJECTION
18.85%
Overall average
Avg Downtime
432
min
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Team Deep Dive
Complete breakdown per team โ€” with strengths, weaknesses, and frequency of each pattern
โ–  Team D
๐Ÿ‘ค Ali Nasser Al Ghafri
๐Ÿฅ‡
Rank 1
Shifts
1
Avg Score
106
Avg Production
193
Avg Rej %
15.0%
๐Ÿ’ช Strengths
๐Ÿ“ˆ
Strong Production
193 Units
1/1
100%
โœจ
High Quality
15.03%
1/1
100%
๐Ÿ›ก
Reliable (Low Downtime)
0 min
1/1
100%
โœ…
Excellent Safety Record
0 high-risk
1/1
100%
โš  Weaknesses
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Attendance Issues
68.4%
1/1
100%
โ–  Team A
๐Ÿ‘ค Ahmed Al Shizawi
๐Ÿฅˆ
Rank 2
Shifts
2
Avg Score
76
Avg Production
128
Avg Rej %
9.3%
๐Ÿ’ช Strengths
โœจ
High Quality
9.26%
1/2
50%
๐Ÿ›ก
Reliable (Low Downtime)
0 min
2/2
100%
โœ…
Excellent Safety Record
0 high-risk
2/2
100%
โš  Weaknesses
๐Ÿ“‰
Low Production
128 Units
1/2
50%
โ–  Team B
๐Ÿ‘ค Omar Saif Al Sidi
๐Ÿฅ‰
Rank 3
No data available for this period
โ–  Team C
๐Ÿ‘ค Al Julanda Salim Al Mama
#4
Rank 4
Shifts
2
Avg Score
-2,191
Avg Production
115
Avg Rej %
27.8%
๐Ÿ’ช Strengths
No notable strengths this period
โš  Weaknesses
๐Ÿ“‰
Low Production
115 Units
2/2
100%
โš 
Quality Issues
27.83%
2/2
100%
โฑ
Frequent Downtime
1,080 min
2/2
100%
๐Ÿšจ
Safety Concerns
2 high-risk
2/2
100%
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Attendance Issues
70.6%
2/2
100%
โš–
Head-to-Head Matrix
Metric-by-metric comparison โ€” best (โญ) vs worst (โš ) highlighted
Metric Team A
Ahmed Al Shizawi
Team B
Omar Saif Al Sidi
Team C
Al Julanda Salim Al Mama
Team D
Ali Nasser Al Ghafri
Shifts 2 0 2 1
Avg Production 128 0 โš  115 193 โญ
AVG REJECTION 9.26% 0.00% โญ 27.83% โš  15.03%
Avg Downtime 0 min โญ 0 min โญ 1,080 min โš  0 min โญ
Avg Attendance 85.00% โญ 0.00% โš  70.59% 68.42%
Machine Utilization 75.00% 0.00% โš  0.00% โš  100.00% โญ
Total High-Risk Obs 0 โญ 0 โญ 2 โš  0 โญ
Consistency (CV%) 47.66% โš  0.00% โญ 0.00% โญ 0.00% โญ
Avg Score 76 0 -2,191 โš  106 โญ
๐Ÿ“Š
Pattern Frequency
How often each team hits these patterns โ€” X out of Y shifts
Pattern Team A Team B Team C Team D
๐Ÿ“ˆ Strong Production Shift
50%
1/2
โ€”
0%
0/2
100%
1/1
๐Ÿ“‰ Weak Production Shift
50%
1/2
โ€”
100%
2/2
0%
0/1
โœจ High Quality Shift
50%
1/2
โ€”
0%
0/2
100%
1/1
โš  Quality Problem Shift
0%
0/2
โ€”
100%
2/2
0%
0/1
๐Ÿ›ก Reliable Shift
100%
2/2
โ€”
0%
0/2
100%
1/1
โฑ Downtime-Heavy Shift
0%
0/2
โ€”
100%
2/2
0%
0/1
โœ… Safe Shift
100%
2/2
โ€”
0%
0/2
100%
1/1
๐Ÿšจ Risk Incident Shift
0%
0/2
โ€”
100%
2/2
0%
0/1
๐Ÿ”ง
Recurring Problem Machines
Machines that broke down 2+ times in this period
Team M/C Breakdown Count Total Downtime Avg Downtime/Incident
Team C sprue drlling 1 2 ร— 1,440 min 720 min
Team C HA furnace 2 ร— 720 min 360 min
๐Ÿ›ก
Common Safety Themes
Recurring keywords in safety observations
Theme/Keyword Count High Risk Count
Leak 2 ๐Ÿ”ด 2
Report generated at: 2026-11-02 23:33 ยท Oman Time