SHIFTS ANALYZED
73
Shift
AVG PRODUCTION / SHIFT
302
Units
AVG REJECTION
13.97%
Overall average
Avg Downtime
145
min
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Team Deep Dive
Complete breakdown per team โ€” with strengths, weaknesses, and frequency of each pattern
โ–  Team B
๐Ÿ‘ค Omar Saif Al Sidi
๐Ÿฅ‡
Rank 1
Shifts
16
Avg Score
177
Avg Production
371
Avg Rej %
13.4%
๐Ÿ’ช Strengths
๐Ÿ“ˆ
Strong Production
371 Units
10/16
63%
๐Ÿ›ก
Reliable (Low Downtime)
18 min
15/16
94%
โš  Weaknesses
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Attendance Issues
62.6%
10/16
63%
๐Ÿ“Š
Inconsistent Performance
CV: 33.4%
โ–  Team A
๐Ÿ‘ค Ahmed Al Shizawi
๐Ÿฅˆ
Rank 2
Shifts
24
Avg Score
-35
Avg Production
234
Avg Rej %
12.3%
๐Ÿ’ช Strengths
โœจ
High Quality
12.26%
10/24
42%
๐Ÿ›ก
Reliable (Low Downtime)
87 min
21/24
88%
โœ…
Excellent Safety Record
0 high-risk
24/24
100%
โš  Weaknesses
๐Ÿ“‰
Low Production
234 Units
13/24
54%
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Attendance Issues
75.7%
16/24
67%
๐Ÿ“Š
Inconsistent Performance
CV: 60.8%
โ–  Team C
๐Ÿ‘ค Al Julanda Salim Al Mama
๐Ÿฅ‰
Rank 3
Shifts
16
Avg Score
-327
Avg Production
335
Avg Rej %
17.7%
๐Ÿ’ช Strengths
๐Ÿ“ˆ
Strong Production
335 Units
8/16
50%
โš  Weaknesses
โš 
Quality Issues
17.74%
11/16
69%
โฑ
Frequent Downtime
244 min
4/16
25%
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Attendance Issues
73.1%
14/16
88%
๐Ÿ“Š
Inconsistent Performance
CV: 36.4%
โ–  Team D
๐Ÿ‘ค Ali Nasser Al Ghafri
#4
Rank 4
Shifts
17
Avg Score
-332
Avg Production
301
Avg Rej %
13.1%
๐Ÿ’ช Strengths
No notable strengths this period
โš  Weaknesses
โฑ
Frequent Downtime
255 min
7/17
41%
๐Ÿšจ
Safety Concerns
6 high-risk
6/17
35%
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Attendance Issues
70.9%
16/17
94%
๐Ÿ“Š
Inconsistent Performance
CV: 35.9%
โš–
Head-to-Head Matrix
Metric-by-metric comparison โ€” best (โญ) vs worst (โš ) highlighted
Metric Team A
Ahmed Al Shizawi
Team B
Omar Saif Al Sidi
Team C
Al Julanda Salim Al Mama
Team D
Ali Nasser Al Ghafri
Shifts 24 16 16 17
Avg Production 234 โš  371 โญ 335 301
AVG REJECTION 12.26% โญ 13.45% 17.74% โš  13.14%
Avg Downtime 87 min 18 min โญ 244 min 255 min โš 
Avg Attendance 75.67% โญ 62.59% โš  73.11% 70.94%
Machine Utilization 85.42% โš  97.86% 86.46% 98.04% โญ
Total High-Risk Obs 0 โญ 1 2 6 โš 
Consistency (CV%) 60.80% โš  33.45% โญ 36.37% 35.95%
Avg Score -35 177 โญ -327 -332 โš 
๐Ÿ“Š
Pattern Frequency
How often each team hits these patterns โ€” X out of Y shifts
Pattern Team A Team B Team C Team D
๐Ÿ“ˆ Strong Production Shift
29%
7/24
63%
10/16
50%
8/16
53%
9/17
๐Ÿ“‰ Weak Production Shift
54%
13/24
25%
4/16
25%
4/16
41%
7/17
โœจ High Quality Shift
42%
10/24
50%
8/16
13%
2/16
59%
10/17
โš  Quality Problem Shift
38%
9/24
31%
5/16
69%
11/16
12%
2/17
๐Ÿ›ก Reliable Shift
88%
21/24
94%
15/16
63%
10/16
53%
9/17
โฑ Downtime-Heavy Shift
8%
2/24
6%
1/16
25%
4/16
41%
7/17
โœ… Safe Shift
100%
24/24
94%
15/16
88%
14/16
65%
11/17
๐Ÿšจ Risk Incident Shift
0%
0/24
6%
1/16
13%
2/16
35%
6/17
๐Ÿ”ง
Recurring Problem Machines
Machines that broke down 2+ times in this period
Team M/C Breakdown Count Total Downtime Avg Downtime/Incident
Team C sprue drlling 1 2 ร— 1,440 min 720 min
Team D HT/Casting lifter 2 ร— 1,440 min 720 min
Team C HA furnace 2 ร— 720 min 360 min
Team D SWM1 2 ร— 660 min 330 min
๐Ÿ›ก
Common Safety Themes
Recurring keywords in safety observations
Theme/Keyword Count High Risk Count
Leak 12 ๐Ÿ”ด 3
Floor 9 ๐Ÿ”ด 2
Damage 5 โ€”
Safety 5 โ€”
Wire 4 โ€”
Dust 4 โ€”
Oil 2 โ€”
Ppe 1 โ€”
Report generated at: 2026-11-03 00:34 ยท Oman Time