Follow-Up Recommendations

🏠 Overview ›👤 Mohammed Juma Al Jabri

RUNS ANALYSED

1,211 Units

ACTUAL REJECTION

6.7%

their own output

EXPECTED REJECTION

6.6%

for their model mix

GAP VS EXPECTED

+0.0

percentage points

🧭

Assessment

Compared like-for-like against the models they were assigned

⚪ Within the expected range. Mohammed Juma Al Jabri performs in line with the rejection expected for the models they were assigned. No follow-up needed on quality grounds.

⚖ Rejection here is measured against the models this person was actually assigned, not a plant-wide average. Someone given harder models should not appear worse for running them. Figures cover a single import period and reflect output only — they do not capture experience, shift conditions, or workload.

🧩

Models Run

Their result on each model against everyone else's result on the same model

Model	Machine Runs	TOTAL PRODUCTION	Their Rejection	Model Baseline	Difference	OEE
Style 640-17 5H	9	710	5.8%	5.0%	+0.7	81%
777-18 5H	2	139	8.6%	5.0%	+3.7	67%
R62 ET- 45-52	1	98	4.1%	7.0%	-2.9	59%
SMX201X-22	1	82	3.7%	9.5%	-5.9	86%
666-17 5H	1	60	0.0%	5.5%	-5.5	0%
BORO112-18	1	48	12.5%	11.0%	+1.5	40%
777-17 4h	1	47	14.9%	23.7%	-8.9	48%
222-18 5H	1	17	23.5%	12.2%	+11.3	34%
Style 640-15 5H	1	10	40.0%	13.7%	+26.3	43%

🏭

Machines Operated

Where they worked, and how each machine performed

M/C No.	Machine Runs	TOTAL PRODUCTION	Rejection %	Total Downtime	OEE
7	4	195	10.3%	180 min	69%
16	4	284	8.1%	330 min	61%
6	4	312	6.4%	70 min	71%
4	2	206	2.4%	0 min	90%
15	2	72	13.9%	120 min	54%
14	1	82	3.7%	0 min	86%
5	1	60	0.0%	120 min	0%

⏱

Downtime by Reason

Downtime recorded during their runs

Reason	Minutes	Share of Downtime
Elec	360 min	43.9
Rework systemic	130 min	15.9
Startup Loss / Specific Gravity Issue (min)	120 min	14.6
DCO (unplanned & >60min)	120 min	14.6
Over Cycle Time	60 min	7.3
Metal Pouring & Dross Cleaning	30 min	3.7

🧭 Follow-Up Recommendations